Your weekly look at the intersection of AI, advocacy, and politics from the team at MFStrategies | www.MFStrategies.com
Campaigns do not succeed by accident. They succeed because early choices create structure, discipline, and narrative control long before voters are paying attention.
MFStrategies has guided Democratic candidates and organizations from inception all the way through the most consequential stages of a cycle.
Fundraising, campaign planning, and execution built to achieve your goals.
Start 2026 with the team that knows how winning campaigns are built.
This week, the ground shifted as the White House moved to centralize AI rules; challenging state laws, standardizing federal buying requirements, and inviting industry to rally behind “consistent” national standards. Beneath the paperwork is a human struggle over control: states trying to protect residents (deepfake rules, benefits safeguards), platforms insisting they’re merely “tools” (Grok’s abuse on X), and agencies racing to deploy AI while promising humans stay in charge (Maryland’s SNAP/Medicaid pilots).
2026’s patchwork of ad, voting, and healthcare pressures will reward whoever can scale content without losing trust or crossing new liability lines.
Taken together, the pattern is preemption plus normalization: Washington is trying to set the baseline just as states and platforms generate the mess that defines “safety.” The open question: when the next deepfake or eligibility scandal hits, will liability land on the toolmakers; or on everyone downstream who used the system as designed?
Healthcare IT News Takeaway Trump signed an executive order to set a national AI framework and preempt state rules. The order creates an AI Litigation Task Force and a 90-day review of state laws. Health IT vendors back a single, risk-based standard to replace a patchwork and say it would speed safe adoption.
Why it matters Centralizing AI rules lets the Trump administration preempt stricter state safeguards and redefine “safety” on industry terms. For campaigns, this isn’t abstract tech policy—it sets who controls patient data, liability, and equity in care, and it previews federal fights over preemption in other AI and consumer protection battles. |
|
ExecutiveGov Takeaway Six months after the AI Action Plan, the White House moved to challenge some state AI laws and OMB set new LLM contracting rules. Agencies must update their buying policies by March 11 and ask vendors for model cards, acceptable use policies, user support, and feedback tools—without forcing disclosure of model weights. HHS, VA, State, and the Army also released AI strategies focused on governance, workforce, health delivery, diplomacy, and records rules.
Why it matters Tightening federal control on AI rules and contracts could set the baseline every state, vendor and campaign ends up living with. The White House push against stricter state laws, paired with “neutrality” standards for models, signals an early fight over who gets to define bias and safety—and what kinds of political speech AI systems quietly downgrade or erase. |
|
POLITICO Takeaway X’s Grok tool made it easy to strip clothes from photos, flooding the platform with sexualized deepfakes, including of minors, and triggering global scrutiny. A new federal law, the Take It Down Act, takes effect in May and targets both users and platforms, requiring 48-hour takedowns and imposing criminal penalties; Section 230 won’t shield X from criminal cases. The fight now is over who is liable — users alone, as Musk argues, or X too, since it built and integrated the tool.
Why it matters This fight will help set who pays for AI harm: fringe trolls or the platforms that build and monetize the tools. If lawmakers and courts treat Grok as “just a user tool,” campaigns should expect weaker guardrails, more abuse, and a playbook for bad actors to hide behind Section 230-era logic. |
|
Governing Takeaway Maryland won more than $2.6 million to pilot AI tools for SNAP, Medicaid, and unemployment services. Two grants ($1.2M and $1.45M) will build open-source tools to verify work rules and help caseworkers, with officials saying staff — not AI — will make all benefit decisions and systems will follow the state’s Responsible AI Policy. The push comes as new federal work rules could affect up to 80,000 people on SNAP and 300,000 people on Medicaid in Maryland.
Why it matters Maryland is quietly becoming a proving ground for “AI for benefits,” which could set the norms other blue states copy—or avoid. If these tools speed up access under Trump’s new work rules, they blunt harm; if they’re used to police eligibility, they’ll normalize algorithmic gatekeeping over food and health care. |
|
Marketplace Tech Takeaway Generative AI in the 2024 cycle was used mainly to speed content production, not to persuade voters, according to CDT’s Tim Harper. High‑profile stunts (candidate chatbots, synthetic robocalls) got attention but didn’t move votes, and most abuse came from non‑campaign actors. Expect sharper use in 2026 as teams normalize these tools; set guardrails now for accuracy, disclosure, and approvals.
Why it matters AI so far is mostly a speed boost for campaigns, not a persuasion weapon—but that gap won’t last. As teams normalize AI for copy and content at scale, the line between “fast drafting” and “micro‑targeted manipulation” will blur, and rules, norms, and in‑house guardrails will matter a lot more. |
|
NBC News Takeaway States are rolling out new 2026 laws on AI deepfakes, paid leave, ACA costs, and voting rules. Some states now require deepfake disclosures and limit AI posing as medical staff, while Maine, Delaware, and Minnesota launch paid leave. ACA subsidies lapse and premiums rise, as 20 states also tighten voting with stricter mail deadlines and ID rules.
Why it matters AI rules, expiring ACA help, and voting crackdowns all hit at once, turning 2026 into a stress test for state power. For campaigns, that means fragmented rules on ads, health care pain with clear villains, and a tighter ballot box—creating both mobilization fuel and hard new barriers to turnout and persuasion. |
|
CNN Business (via AOL) Takeaway OPM launched “US Tech Force” to hire 1,000 early‑career AI and tech workers for two‑year placements across federal agencies. Recruits could work on drones and weapons at DoD, IRS “Trump Accounts,” and State Department intelligence projects, with pay from $130k–$195k. The program partners with Microsoft, Adobe, Amazon, Meta, and xAI, and aims to place most of the first cohort by early 2026.
Why it matters This turns federal service into a two‑year AI boot camp feeding talent back to industry, not building long‑term capacity. Campaigns should expect more normalized AI use in weapons, tax, and intel, with policy shaped by young, rotating technocrats and corporate partners whose incentives don’t match public accountability. |
|
Worth Thinking About This Week
“In healthcare, regulatory fragmentation is not a nuisance; it is a threat. … A single federal AI framework is imperative to protect patients, accelerate innovation, and keep America ahead.” — Aaron Patzer, Vital.io
Spend more time winning with MFStrategies
Focus on what matters most in your campaign. MFStrategies helps Democratic candidates and causes turn strategy into success with expert fundraising, voter engagement, and campaign consulting rooted in decades of experience.
Whether you’re launching a first run or scaling up your current effort, start with a 30 minute free strategy session and build momentum with a team that knows how to deliver results.
