Your weekly look at the intersection of AI, advocacy, and politics from the team at MFStrategies | www.MFStrategies.com
Stop fixing the same spreadsheet over and over.
Kit Workflows helps you clean up messy lists, save the steps, and reuse them anytime the next file shows up. Upload a file or pull data from the tools you already use, fix it fast, and move on.
No formulas. No scripts. No starting from scratch when you have a meeting in 20 minutes.
This week, AI politics changed when official power started treating synthetic media as a punchline—while other arms of government quietly moved to make AI faster, more embedded, and harder to contest.
The White House’s “meme” of a real arrest shows how state channels can launder manipulated images into everyday discourse, daring critics to either amplify it or look humorless as trust thins.
Meanwhile, the Pentagon’s AI Acceleration Strategy and states’ push to keep AI rulemaking authority signal a parallel race for control: ship models at commercial speed, swap components quickly, and fight over “objectivity” as a stand-in for ideology.
Taken together with rising state AG/FTC privacy and deepfake enforcement, the pattern is stark: AI is being normalized in public life before the rules of evidence, consent, and accountability are settled.
The question now is who sets the defaults first—official communicators, commanders, courts, or state regulators—and what happens when everyone can dismiss the record as “AI.”
San Francisco Chronicle (AP) Takeaway The White House posted a doctored image of civil rights attorney Nekima Levy Armstrong crying after her arrest, then defended it as a “meme.” Experts warn this state-backed use of AI-edited visuals deepens distrust, invites copycats, and makes it harder for the public to tell truth from propaganda.
Why it matters The Trump White House turning a real arrest into a “meme” normalizes state-backed disinformation and makes outrage itself a distribution strategy. Once official channels treat manipulated images as jokes, it gets harder to police bad faith content, blurs what counts as evidence, and arms Republicans to dismiss real footage as “AI” when it hurts them. |
|
Nextgov/FCW Takeaway The Pentagon rolled out an AI Acceleration Strategy to make the military “AI‑first,” launching seven Pace‑Setting Projects across warfighting, intelligence, and enterprise. It directs the CDAO to enable deployment of the latest commercial models within 30 days, sets monthly demos starting July 2026, and leans on modular open systems to swap components quickly. It also adds “model objectivity” benchmarks and anti‑ideology language, signaling faster adoption with new political and operational risks.
Why it matters This pushes the Pentagon to buy and plug in cutting‑edge commercial AI almost as fast as Silicon Valley ships it—shifting risk from defense labs to vendors and frontline commanders. The political fight over “ideological” models turns model selection into a proxy culture war, creating new levers for GOP appointees to reward friendly firms and pressure evaluators. |
|
WilmerHale Privacy and Cybersecurity Law Blog Takeaway State AGs and the FTC stepped up AI privacy enforcement in 2025, targeting false claims, unclear data use, and child risks, even as the Trump FTC rolled back one consent order in the name of “innovation.” Courts split on whether chatbots and training data violate wiretap and privacy laws, letting some class claims move ahead and tossing others. More than half of states passed deepfake laws, and courts set new rules on lawyers’ use of AI.
Why it matters Courts are slowly drawing lines around what counts as “consent” and “interception” when AI tools log, train on, or reuse user data—especially with kids involved. That makes chatbot scripts, data‑sharing, and fine‑tuning choices legal risk, not just UX. Campaigns and nonprofits that copy commercial AI patterns could inherit those liabilities. |
|
StateScoop Takeaway NASCIO set its 2026 asks: keep states in charge of AI rules, renew the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program, and reauthorize FirstNet. It also backs wider .gov use and simpler federal cyber rules. The big change is swapping workforce advocacy for FirstNet reauthorization ahead of a 2027 deadline.
Why it matters NASCIO’s push ties three big threads together: keeping states in the AI driver’s seat, locking in long‑term cyber funding, and protecting first‑responder communications. If Congress moves toward federal AI preemption or lets grants/FirstNet lapse, state capacity to police AI harms and handle crises weakens—and industry gains leverage. |
|
Worth Thinking About This Week
“By sharing this kind of content … it is eroding the trust … we should have in our federal government to give us accurate, verified information.” — Michael A. Spikes, Northwestern University
Spend more time winning with MFStrategies
Focus on what matters most in your campaign. MFStrategies helps Democratic candidates and causes turn strategy into success with expert fundraising, voter engagement, and campaign consulting rooted in decades of experience.
Whether you’re launching a first run or scaling up your current effort, start with a 30 minute free strategy session and build momentum with a team that knows how to deliver results.